A client of mine was recently left in a predicament after losing his partner of 22 years. The red tape and legal complexities surrounding the administration of a deceased estate, particularly for an unmarried partner as opposed to a legal spouse, served as a stark reminder of the importance of organising one’s affairs at every stage of life.
It often happens that unmarried couples mistakenly believe they are protected as “common law” spouses and, as such, are afforded the same level of protection as married couples regarding inheritances and taxes. However, South Africa does not recognise the concept of a common law marriage. Simply living with a partner for an extended period, even with children, does not necessarily lead to financial protection.
Although civil marriages are the most common form of marriage in South Africa, customary marriages, religious marriages, and civil unions all carry most of the same protections and financial benefits as a civil marriage.
However, many South Africans live together under the implicit assumption that their years of partnership and cohabitation mean they will still enjoy the same rights and protections afforded to married couples. This is not the case.
At the heart of the matter, if you are not married and do not have a cohabitation or universal partnership agreement, you and your partner are not legally entitled to any share of each other’s estate, either upon separation or death.
Even during the relationship, an unmarried couple will not receive the same benefits as a married couple unless a written agreement proves they are life partners. This means, for example, that donations tax applies to donations between partners, any assets received in a will from one partner will be liable to capital gains tax and estate duty, and any inherited properties will have transfer duty levied on them.
Unmarried partners also cannot inherit as intestate heirs under the Intestate Succession Act or claim maintenance from the deceased estate of their partners, even if they are life partners.
Although maintenance for children can still be claimed, provided the child is born of the union between the couple, this can often be inadequate to provide fully for a partner and their children, particularly compared to the maintenance provided to married couples.
What should you do?
If you and your partner do not wish to marry, there are still ways to ensure that both parties are protected financially. This can be done by drawing up a will or entering a formal agreement or contract between the parties. Without such protection, your partner may not benefit from any assets you leave behind or even be able to stay in the home after your death.
Since 2012, there have been some important developments in South African law, particularly with the Butter’s case. An exception to the above safeguarding rules is if your relationship can be defined as a universal partnership. However, the commencement of a relationship does not automatically mean that a universal partnership exists. Neither does living together or having children together constitute a universal partnership.
A universal partnership exists only if both parties can prove that the purpose of their relationship is to pool their assets and resources for mutual benefit, specifically to make a profit. There must also be an intention to form a universal partnership.
Proving the existence of a universal partnership without a signed document is possible, but it involves a lengthy court case and requires substantial evidentiary support, which is both costly and time-consuming. Therefore, if you are in a long-term relationship and do not wish to marry, it is crucial to formalise your financial arrangements in a written agreement.
Ultimately, if you choose not to marry, taking proactive steps to safeguard your and your partner’s future is essential. By understanding your legal standing and ensuring proper estate planning, you can avoid unnecessary complications and ensure that your partner is cared for in the way you intend.
Stacy Rouchos is an estate planning consultant to Hobbs Sinclair.
Disclaimer: The views expressed in this article are those of the writer and are not necessarily shared by Moonstone Information Refinery or its sister companies. The information in this article does not constitute financial planning, tax, or legal advice that is appropriate for every individual’s needs and circumstances.
This article seems to disagree with a previous Moneyweb article:
https://www.moneyweb.co.za/financial-advisor-views/marriage-vs-cohabitation-the-different-financial-consequences/
Specifically around taxation of donations tax and estate duty tax.
So who is right?
I shall endeavour to find out.
Stacy Rouchos provided the following response:
Donations tax and income tax exemptions are only for a spouse. Per the Income Tax Act, a spouse is defined as the following:
“[S]pouse”, in relation to any person, means a person who is the partner of such person—
(a) in a marriage or customary union recognised in terms of the laws of the Republic;
(b) in a union recognised as a marriage in accordance with the tenets of any religion; or
(c) in a same-sex or heterosexual union which is intended to be permanent, and “married”, “husband” or “wife” shall be construed accordingly:
Provided that a marriage or union contemplated in paragraph (b) or (c) shall, in the absence of proof to the contrary, be deemed to be a marriage or union out of community of property
For a heterosexual couple who are cohabiting but not married, and do not have any sort of written universal partnership agreement of any sort, they would not be able to claim any spousal benefits from SARS, nor will they be able to claim spousal maintenance from their partner or their estate should they pass.