The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) has expressed its concern about high premium increases that are being implemented by insurers on funeral policies throughout the industry.
While it is aware of the impact of COVID-19 on mortality rates and funeral policy claims, insurers are expected to comply with legal obligations and to ensure fair outcomes for policyholders. Insurers are therefore reminded to consider the existing requirements and to follow the appropriate processes. Insurers must be able to demonstrate that they are complying with the provisions of the LTIA, particularly the PPRs and treating their customers fairly.
FSCA expectations when insurers effect premium increases on their funeral books
- Insurers must ensure that in line with Rule 1.2 of the Policyholder Protection Rules (PPRs) that they act with due skill, care and diligence when dealing with policyholders in implementing any increase in premiums. Premiums must be priced correctly at the inception of the policy so that any increases which may be implemented would still result in fair outcomes for policyholders and the policy continuing to perform as expected.
- Insurers must ensure that the premiums that they set are actuarially sound, in line with Section 46 (1)(a) of the LTIA. Insurers must also ensure that the premiums they set at the inception of the policy reasonably balance the interests of the insurer and the reasonable benefit expectations of policyholders. The premiums must be based on assumptions that are realistic and that the insurer reasonably believes are likely to be met over the term of the policy, in line with Rule 6(1) of the PPRs. It is the FSCA’s view that if policies were not priced correctly at inception of the policy and exorbitant increases are thereafter implemented due to the impact of COVID-19 or underwriting losses, this would result in unfair outcomes for policyholders. Such increases would not be compliant with Rule 15.5(e) of the PPRs, which provides that: “A review of a premium payable under a policy will not comply with 15.4 if the primary purpose or effect of the review is to allow for the adjustment of a low initial premium consciously based on overly optimistic assumptions …….”.
- The FSCA reminds insurers that Rule 15(1) of the PPRs requires that: “a premium payable under a policy may only be reviewed if the policy provides for a review and states the frequency at which and the circumstances in which a review will take place”. The alleged practice by some insurers of increasing premiums more than once for the same policy within a 12-month period (even though the terms and conditions allow only for increases on the anniversary of the policy) falls foul of the requirements of Rule 15(1) of the PPRs.
- The Authority has also noted that some insurers are exponentially increasing premiums on funeral policies without considering the requirements of Rule 15(4)(a) of the PPRs which provides that: “any review of a premium payable under a policy must reasonably balance the interests of the insurer and the reasonable benefit expectations of policyholders or members”.
- Insurers are further required to consider Rule 15.6 of the PPRs which stipulates that: “an insurer must timeously and in writing inform a policyholder of a pending review and the timing of the review if the review is expected to result in a premium increase”.
- Insurers must also take into account Rule 15.7 of the PPRs which provides that: “If a premium payable under a risk policy will be increased as a result of a review, an insurer must take reasonable steps to afford a policyholder alternatives (such as the option to terminate the policy, to reduce the policy benefit or to enter into an alternative policy) to mitigate the impact of the increase on the policyholder.
Good day
I run a broker company and do group funeral underwriting that is being administered by Transact and Protect insure( TPI instant cover) underwritten by Guardrisk, They are implementing a price increase from next year and that ranges anything between 50% to 150% increase and this is randomly on one book so some policies gets 55% and some policies get 95% etc. This increase is very steep and results in the Funeral parlor premium being doubled or even tripled from what it was previously
Can you please give me feedback from the FSCA if this is standard practice and in accordance to the PPR rules and the LTIA
Thank you
This depends on the policy terms and conditions. Note that funeral insurance generally has a very small risk premium and the bulk of the gross premium that is paid by the client includes administration charges and fees.
Other than in the first 12 months of a funeral policy, there is no restriction on the increases that an insurer can charge on premiums. It would largely be as a result of poor claims experience and in particular in differing categories of clients.
Hello I bought Funeral cover last year August 2022 from two Mountains , the monthly premium agreed upon was R210, on April this year 2023, I received a notice from my phone stating that from the 1st of May to 1st of June premiums are going up (increasing) from R210 to R655, I just want to know if is that normal and if not, what can I do to get help in this situation
Good day
It is not uncommon for insurers to increase premiums massively. In my experience, the best way to handle this is to contact the insurer and say the increase is excessive and you want to cancel. It may be useful to obtain quotes from other (competitor) insurers first. However, in my experience, insurers send out letters about premium increases and simply hope clients will just accept them (maybe they don’t read the letters). Whenever I have challenged the increase, the agent “looks into my file/profile” or “speaks to the supervisor about what we can do” and the increase is significantly reduced.
The law doesn’t protect the insurer but the business of insurance companies. When a person takes a funeral cover we know it’s a risk protection policy; however, people tent to pay for years without any claims and some lose their jobs and can’t afford the ever increasing rates and declining services. I think this must be reviewed by FSCA as a person stands to lose a lot of money on this short term insurances and it’s mostly blacks as whites really look thoroughly into these economic . It’s like putting money into a drain should you lose your job and fail to pay subscriptions. There’s no clause that says maybe we will give a certain portion of you lose your source of income.