Ex-employees implicated in MyMo accounts scandal take debarments to the tribunal
Former Standard Bank staff contend that the FAIS Act did not apply to their debarment and conduct.
Former Standard Bank staff contend that the FAIS Act did not apply to their debarment and conduct.
Authority also pulls the licence of Stringfellow Financial Services.
More than 600 investors lost their money – some exceeding R1 million each.
FST’s decision reveals a litany of problems with the procedure followed.
Applicant argues that non-compliance is not a contravention when the law does not provide for a penalty.
A single act of dishonesty, incompetence, mismanagement or negligence may not by itself be grounds for debarment.
The Authority wants to get a better understanding of the conduct risks related to crypto activities.
This case sends a serious warning to those who allow “spotters” to work under their licence.
Tribunal draws attention to the effect of selling the franchise house business on the financial adviser agreement.
The requirements for advice fees in the context of insurance policies will be dealt with by amending the insurance regulations.
The FSCA had already reduced the penalties and dropped the intention to debar for 10 years.
Tribunal repeats its previous ‘recommendation’ that the FAIS Ombud obtain oral and expert evidence to resolve the disputes of fact.
Referring clients to another broker does not constitute advice for the purposes of the FAIS Act.
And how the Financial Services Tribunal assesses whether the fine was appropriate.
These include delays with funeral policy claims, advice to clients who buy living annuities, and insurance policy disclosures.
Attendance is limited to the first 1 300 people who register.
It’s possible that, at some point, providers of crypto asset services will be required to submit third-party data to Sars.