Key individual asks for R500k fine and five-year debarment to be reconsidered
Applicant argues that non-compliance is not a contravention when the law does not provide for a penalty.
Applicant argues that non-compliance is not a contravention when the law does not provide for a penalty.
Applicant obtains High Court orders to get her share of ex-husband’s pension interest.
Labour legislation sets down the criteria that determine whether someone is an employee.
JSE imposes fines totalling R15 million and bars Steinhoff’s former chief executive from holding office as a director.
Can a director be held criminally liable for acts or transgressions by a company?
Prudential Authority fined them an effective R2.688m for contraventions of the Short-term Insurance Act and the Insurance Act.
How does section 218 of the Financial Sector Regulation Act define what ‘a decision’ is?
A single act of dishonesty, incompetence, mismanagement or negligence may not by itself be grounds for debarment.
This case sends a serious warning to those who allow “spotters” to work under their licence.
Tribunal draws attention to the effect of selling the franchise house business on the financial adviser agreement.
Discrepancy between the figures on his benefit statement and those on Sanlam’s website.
This is a year after the Financial Services Tribunal set aside the Authority’s penalty of almost R162 million.
The FSCA had already reduced the penalties and dropped the intention to debar for 10 years.
Tribunal was ‘not afforded the courtesy’ of an explanation for the ombud’s failure to respond to questions from the deputy chairperson.
Tribunal repeats its previous ‘recommendation’ that the FAIS Ombud obtain oral and expert evidence to resolve the disputes of fact.
Referring clients to another broker does not constitute advice for the purposes of the FAIS Act.
And how the Financial Services Tribunal assesses whether the fine was appropriate.