Dispute over cancelled policy: FST orders FAIS Ombud to reconsider decision
The Tribunal’s decision underscores that financial advisers’ duties are limited to the specific terms of their engagement.
The Tribunal’s decision underscores that financial advisers’ duties are limited to the specific terms of their engagement.
The former owner of Gundo Wealth Solutions has been fined R3 million and debarred for a decade for brokering investments into VBS Mutual Bank.
The rep claimed he never meant to harm the FSP, but the FST found his actions violated the FAIS Act and demonstrated a lack of integrity.
The complainant was aggrieved because he received R470 000 from the R700 000 put into an investment plan with income.
The Authority should have conducted its own investigation and not relied solely on information provided by the insurer, the Tribunal says.
The FAIS Ombud issues a determination after the FSP fails to follow through on its undertaking to settle the claim.
‘A key individual is not only responsible to oversee the categories of financial services for which he is licensed, but he bears an oversight role in relation to the FSP generally.’
The complaint arose because the policyholders were under the impression the new policy had retroactive cover.