Court orders Discovery to deduct maintenance payments from defaulter’s RA
The existence of the RA funds demonstrates that the husband was able to pay the arrear maintenance, judge says.
The existence of the RA funds demonstrates that the husband was able to pay the arrear maintenance, judge says.
The first wife bought wedding dresses for the third and fourth wives, but this did not prove that she consented to the marriages.
The High Court rejects Compass’s submissions that the insured made a material misrepresentation and breached a warranty.
The Registrar believes the products sold by Netcare Plus and Discovery Health constitute the business of a medical scheme.
The High Court also rejects a wife’s claim for R300 000 to pay for renovations and furniture, saying Rule 43 does not provide for lump-sum payments.
The High Court has dismissed the administrator’s second attempt to compel the Fund to resume processing medical scheme members’ claims.
Legal missteps in a substitution application have left a R2.5m claim against a law firm implicated in a 2010 Ponzi scheme dead in the water.
There is a view that the High Court’s judgment means the in duplum rule does not apply to section 13A(7) interest.
Couple allege the bank said it would freeze the account when it became aware of the fraudulent transaction.
Judge says the FST did not follow a fair procedure when it summarily dismissed the reconsideration application.
The latest round of litigation between the Board of the Healthcare Funders and the CMS over low-cost medical schemes.
The High Court was asked to rule on whether the clients’ financial loss was caused by breach of agreement or the Reserve Bank’s intervention.
Evercrest Capital collapsed 16 years ago after it incurred a huge loss trying to short Sanlam’s shares.
The insurer was entitled to provide security for the disputed balance of the storage costs to have the motor vehicle released and stop incurring further charges.
Adjudication of the complaints requires hearings, which are more conducive to a court of law, the Ombud says.
Medical schemes industry body says it did not receive all the documents it requested for its case against the regulator.
High Court rejects argument that a person can use the allowances of other individuals because the transfers were approved by an authorised dealer.