Unnoticed changes to documents crucial to BI dispute between mall owners and insurers
The contract went through 10 iterations between July 2019 and March 2020, with the term ‘infectious and contagious diseases’ variously in or out.
The contract went through 10 iterations between July 2019 and March 2020, with the term ‘infectious and contagious diseases’ variously in or out.
The applicant only became aware in May last year that the decision to debar her constituted administrative action.
The group claimed R200m in VAT refunds for importing, storing, and selling diesel.
A property seller loses an appeal to retain a R1m deposit – the purchaser had not validly waived his rights to a suspensive condition.
The late Markus Jooste’s alleged romantic partner has applied to the SCA for permission to appeal the High Court’s ruling that effectively bars her from accessing a monthly living allowance of R150 000.
The insurance marketer was an independent contractor – no mutual indebtedness existed between him and TWK Agri.
The suspicion that the third party’s vehicle contained material relevant to the taxpayer under investigation was sufficient for it to be searched, SCA finds.
Meanwhile, Solidarity suffers a setback in its efforts to halt the government’s preparations for implementing the system.
The High Court confirms that an acknowledgment of debt, even if not directly made to the creditor, interrupts the time limit for legal action.
Her refusal to agree to move the children to a public school has resulted in the children not attending school at all.
If Hollard’s ‘contradictory’ interpretation were correct, it could never be held liable to make payment, says judge.
The Equality Court makes an order in an application brought by six natural and juristic persons whose bank accounts were closed by Absa and FNB.
The Full Bench of the High Court finds that the Authority’s investigating panel did not treat Michael Deighton unfairly.
The policyholder did not disclose two previous ‘minor’ incidents involving a different vehicle and a different insurer.
Judge says the courts have a duty to assess whether contracts do not offend against constitutional principles, as well as the NCA and the CPA.