Allegations that Sanlam adviser forged signatures don’t stand up, Tribunal finds
It was a ‘material factor’ that the specimen signatures were in hard copy, whereas the disputed signatures were electronic.
It was a ‘material factor’ that the specimen signatures were in hard copy, whereas the disputed signatures were electronic.
The rep said she corrected the errors herself to avoid inconveniencing the customer and embarrassing the company, not to commit fraud.
Is the FSCA obliged to grant an exemption if a fund has met all the conditions set out in Board Notice 59 of 2014?
The Financial Services Tribunal hears the reconsideration applications brought by three of the 15 implicated agents.
FNB argued the Tribunal should accord greater weight to the severity of the rep’s misconduct than to ‘procedural mis-steps’.
More than a year passed between the employer indicating that it reserved its right to withhold a former employee’s withdrawal benefit and instituting civil proceedings against him.
The FST emphasises that labour-related and FAIS-related matters are distinct.
The FST questions why he would take a call on his private cellphone from a friend of a friend and access confidential information without authority.
The decision comes in the same week in which Steinhoff is due to be liquidated and delisted.
The company did not inform shareholders timeously of the effects of a change to the terms of a loan.
The debarment procedure did not comply with the FAIS Act in a number of ways, the FST finds.
‘Conduct of this kind undermines public confidence in financial markets and leads the general public to believe that the system is rigged and unfair,’ Tribunal says.
The Financial Services Tribunal hears another case involving a representative who ‘completed’ proof of address letter on clients’ behalf.
The fact that the applicant did not sell any products or receive remuneration did not nullify his status as a representative.
Standard Bank debarred a branch team leader for using her own money to activate four accounts without the customers’ consent.
The jurisdictional fact required for the debarment was absent.
The member’s benefit was transferred from the money market investment into the fund’s business account.