Representative debarred for submitting falsified Uber receipts
The Tribunal reiterates that FSPs should not issue a debarment purely on the outcome of a disciplinary hearing.
The Tribunal reiterates that FSPs should not issue a debarment purely on the outcome of a disciplinary hearing.
Mbalane Financial Services tells the Tribunal it was entitled to wait for a final forensic report from Old Mutual.
Judge says the FST did not follow a fair procedure when it summarily dismissed the reconsideration application.
Craig Massyn submits the penalties imposed on him were disproportionately large compared to those imposed on the other directors of the Praesidium Group.
Did the FSCA’s regulatory reach extended to UK pension funds and structures, held offshore, and permitted and regulated by UK and European Union law?
No evidence that staff were instructed to verify prospective clients’ addresses using blank letters provided by the municipality, FST finds.
Two recent decisions by the tribunal highlight misconceptions about debarment that need to be dispelled.
FST does not accept submission that the impact of Covid on the markets absolved the employer of liability for the loss.
FNB debars consultant who issued unauthorised letters stating a company was good for up to R900 million in credit.
The former bank manager’s actions were driven by desperation, but the FAIS Act is not forgiving, the tribunal says.
Prudential Authority rejects application by Pepkor subsidiary Abacus to underwrite the risks of its parent company in addition to third-party risks.
Material discrepancies about a newly appointed financial planner’s employment history came to light while she was being on-boarded.
In one case, the FSP was still investigating the alleged fraud when it decided to bar the representative.
His FSPs were fined a total of R250 000 for selling two products before they were licensed.
The fund said the automated payment of the spouse’s 50% interest was already in process, and the payment could not be stopped.
The decision highlights numerous irregularities at the Private Security Sector Provident Fund that were not reported to the FSCA.
The decision sets out how PSSPF board members racked up fees for meetings and ignored the fund’s procurement policy.