Debarment for being paid a referral fee by a competitor not justified, says FST
The employer did not point to a single provision in the FAIS Act, or any other legislation, that prohibits this.
The employer did not point to a single provision in the FAIS Act, or any other legislation, that prohibits this.
Moriting Wealth Managers was not given an opportunity to state its case before the final determination was issued.
The applicant was ‘left to guess’ the factual allegations on which the intended debarment was based, tribunal says.
She alleged the evidence of her conduct was obtained through an ‘unlawful search’ of her personal email account.
Applicant tells the tribunal she transferred the information to her private Gmail account to support her complaint to the CCMA.
This case is an example of what good cause is not.
The board’s rushed decision, based on unaudited interim figures, put the shareholder’s interests above those of the policyholders, tribunal says.
The far-reaching implications of debarment were not justified in the circumstances, the FST finds.
This case sends a serious warning to those who allow “spotters” to work under their licence.
Tribunal draws attention to the effect of selling the franchise house business on the financial adviser agreement.
Tribunal was ‘not afforded the courtesy’ of an explanation for the ombud’s failure to respond to questions from the deputy chairperson.
Tribunal repeats its previous ‘recommendation’ that the FAIS Ombud obtain oral and expert evidence to resolve the disputes of fact.
Referring clients to another broker does not constitute advice for the purposes of the FAIS Act.
Insurer argues that ‘days’ means ‘normal days’, but the Financial Services Tribunal does not agree.
A representative who failed to attend his debarment hearing was also a no-show when his reconsideration application was heard by the Financial Services Tribunal (FST). The representative’s ground for reconsideration was that he […]
Financial Services Tribunal upholds their debarment, saying ‘filching’ client information is not only a contractual issue.
Whistleblower asserts that members’ money was stolen, although a forensic investigation found no evidence of this.