Discovery Health’s quest for reimbursement from the RAF for medical expenses incurred by road accident victims has faced multiple legal hurdles, with new RAF directives complicating the situation.
The judgment highlights the impact of Steinhoff’s collapse on retirement funds and the public’s right to understand the nation’s biggest corporate scandal.
The court’s interpretation and application of the conduit principle has implications for structures involving layers of multiple discretionary trusts.
The departure point in determining whether a company qualifies for the foreign business establishment tax exemption is what it actually does.
The appellant contended that the arbitration clause in the settlement agreement conflicted with section 2(a) of the Arbitration Act.
Coronation withdraws cautionary to shareholders following victory in litigation with SARS over the foreign business establishment tax exemption.
Litigation between Trustco and the JSE over the group’s financial statements.
The appeal court also confirms the principles relating to the link between a notifiable disease and causation in respect of business interruption policies.
The High Court’s judgment opened the door to unlimited claims against businesses whose clients suffered losses because of email interception.
The decision could set a precedent for taxpayers seeking relief from interest after reaching a Voluntary Disclosure Programme agreement with SARS.
The decision confirms that directors are generally not liable to the company’s creditors unless there is an abuse of the corporate structure.
The signing of the NHI Act does not mean the BHF is letting up in its fight for regulations on low-cost benefit options.
Old Mutual Unit Trust Managers did not owe a direct statutory duty to the trust and its beneficiaries but to the trust’s administrator.
Old Mutual Unit Trust Managers off the hook for R1.7 billion claim arising from Fidentia scandal.
A property seller loses an appeal to retain a R1m deposit – the purchaser had not validly waived his rights to a suspensive condition.
The suspicion that the third party’s vehicle contained material relevant to the taxpayer under investigation was sufficient for it to be searched, SCA finds.
The Supreme Court of Appeal’s recent decision underscores the critical importance of understanding ‘transactions at arm’s length’ under the National Credit Act.
